KW: It’s interesting that now all the claims have been made that the evidence and arguments against the Theresa May claims of Russian involvement are starting to fall apart. I think the link to the Steele anti Trump dossier is the most likely to be the truth. After all why would Russia use a chemical that supposedly could be traced back to them to kill someone (and produce a failed outcome/result) when a simple pistol shot with silencer or knife attack would do the job with no possible trace? As well what about the female doctor reported to have been the first on the scene and no effects unlike the so called policeman. And what about CCTV footage? It’s everywhere in Britain and surely there is film of the alleged perpetrator. Show him/her for all to see the actionat the site.  Things just don’t add up.

Russia’s UN Security Council representative Vasily Nebenzya vehemently denied British allegations that Russia perpetrated a nerve agent attack on UK soil, while imploring Council members to think critically about the incident.  For the British specialists to be perfectly confident that this was a Novichok agent and not any other kind, they would need a control standard for proof. It [the substance used in the attack] must be compared to a control substance,” Nebenzya stated. “They have a collection and they have the formula. In other words, if the UK is so firmly convinced this is Novichok, they have samples and formula and are capable of formulating it themselves.”

Source: MoA – Are ‘Novichok’ Poisons Real? – May’s Claims Fall Apart

Listen to George Galloway: Russia could not benefit from Skripal poisoning. ‘Absurd’ that Russia would leave it signature on the Skripal crime